You are here:
RailNet
Home Page > DCC
Contacts
   
      | DCC
         Contacts | 
 | 
   
      | 
            Scope: This page lists
            club, groups, and individuals in Central Pa who are
            involved in DCC. | 
 
   
      | 
  
    
    
    ** MENU - RailNet **
    
  
  
    
    
      
        
            
             
       |   | Contents This
         Page1. DCC Contacts In Central
         Pennsylvania (below)2. A Few National DCC Resources
         (below)3. Some Fred Cupp Opinions On Some
         Of The Different DCC Systems (below) | 
 
   - Note: To use email
   addresses, first remove the capital letters
   "SPAMMERS-DIE"--these
   extra garbage characters are intended to deter the spammer's
   address-mining robots.
   
      | 1. DCC Contacts In
         Central Pennsylvania | 
 
   - Allentown (Bethlehem) - Stan Price
   of the Black Diamond Society is using Atlas DCC.
   
   
   
- Lancaster (Strasburg) - The
   Pennsylvania Railroad Education center is using DCC on their
   G-scale layout, and also their HO scale layout. I believe the
   manufacturer is North Coast Engineering.
   
   
   
- Lancaster - The South Penn MRC is
   using Digitrax on their entire layout. 
   
   
   
- State College - John Balogh - John
   is the National Chairman of the NMRA DCC SIG. HIs email is
   jdbSPAMMERS-DIE@psu.edu
   and his work phone is 814-863-1252. His DCC SIG Information Page
   is at http://jdb.psu.edu/nmra/dccsig.html
- Williamsport - Fred Cupp - Fred has
   worked extensively with North Coast Engineering, including having
   assisted in writing some of the manuals, assembling decoders from
   kits, and has written programs in Quickbasic to computer control
   the North Coast command station. Fred can be reached at
   fbcuppSPAMMERS-DIE@chilitech.net,
   and his phone is 570-321-5687.
- Williamsport - Jim Ingram - I am not
   particularly knowledgeble about DCC, but I do have some
   experience, including using a Quickbasic program (written courtesy
   of Fred Cupp) to automatically ramp up and down an S gauge engine
   equipped with a Soundtraxx decoder, for operation on a small
   display layout (layout
   photo). Phone & email at bottom
   this page.
   
      | 2. A Few National DCC
         Resources | 
 A Few National DCC
Resources
   
      | 3. Some Fred Cupp
         Opinions On Some Of The Different DCC Systems | 
 
   - Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 10:13:15
   -0500
- From: "Fred B. Cupp"
   <fbcupp@e.....>
   - Digitrax - Obviously first to market
   with many new products, however they also have the record for
   recalls and support complaints. In addition,it is conceeded that
   the human interface is very hard to learn and especially bad if
   you don't use it regularly, (weekly). The internet discussion
   lists have many complaints about the "multi-key"entries to select
   locos and features.
 
 
- Easy DCC (CVP products) - They are
   ahead of the game with a radio throttle, but the DCC systems are
   not a plug-n-play concept. You buy a bunch of boards, cabinets, or
   even kits to assemble. Easy DCC is probably the lowest price for
   the most features, but you need to be technically adept to
   assemble and set it up.
 
 
- Lenz, Zimo - As they are European,
   the support is a little poorer and the info needs a little more
   "translation". Although they are in English, we do have some
   problems in terminology, etc.
 
 
- Model Recitifier Corporation (MRC) -
   This is a beginner's entry level system. While it is technically
   in compliance with the NMRA DCC standard, it only performs a
   limited subset of the features covered by the standard. You cannot
   use the actual locomotive cab numbers, you can use only 1, 2, 3,
   4, 5, etc; in groups of 3 at a time. You can run any group of 3 at
   a time, but you cannot intermix them. Unfortunately a user who
   starts out with this system and then wishes to migrate to a more
   advanced system may have to install new, more-capable decoders, to
   get all the features of the better systems.
- A North Coast Engineering (NCE) -
   Pricewise, (apples to apples), they are just a slight bit higher
   than Digitrax, but much easier to set up and use. (IMHO). The
   quality control of the product is very high. (My system is still
   running without any failure since about 1989.) And I beat my
   system! The entire line of NCE decoders is now shifted over to the
   "Silent Running" type of motor PWM.
 
 
- Wangrow - North Coast originally
   produced the Wangrow "System One". About three years ago, Don
   Wangrow decided to split, manufacture and also write his competing
   version of software. He has been mostly playing catch up, leaving
   new product development and customer support deteriorate.
 If you want to have the most complete set of features available at
   only a minor increase in price, then the North Coast would be
   preferable to the Wangrow.
As a closer, I will include a quote from a
message on the net just this morning, by Ed Loizeaux. He is one of
the three authors of the book "Digital Command Control" the
Comprehensive Guide to DCC.
   - Regards,
- Fred
- ---------------------------------------------o--------------------------------------
-  
- Subject: Why NCE was
   chosen.....
-  
- > I am curious why you choose
   NCE 
-  
- In my case, the following factors
   influenced me (not necessarily in any order of
   importance):
-  
- 1. Personality of the owner. NCE's owner is
   an active O scale modeler with a keen interest in prototypical
   operations. Owners of other firms may have an interest in trains,
   but are not actively modeling. Some owners really turned me off
   with their attitudes. It is easy to meet owners at the annual NMRA
   National Convention & Train Show.
-  
- 2. Best manual on the block. Easy to
   comprehend by the non-technical person. 
-  
- 3. NMRA conformance certificate for nearly
   all products. Strong public support for the NMRA program instead
   of carping about it like a certain other DCC firm.
-  
- 4. Empathy for any managerial-level
   professional engineer working a secure job with a large
   corporation who voluntarily gives it up to become self-employed
   making model railroad equipment for the rest of us to enjoy. Crazy
   reason, perhaps, it relates to my personal life as well. Wanted to
   help out.
-  
- 5. Conviction that all the rah-tah-doo
   about "get off the bus" was a bunch of hooey.
-  
- 6. Detailed technical support was easily
   available without the need to deal with a bunch of non-technical
   lower-level folks prior to receiving the desired
   answer.
-  
- (Jim usually answers the phone himself. He
   says he handles an average of 85 calls per day!)
   [Fred]
-  
-  
- 7. I liked the other users/customers of the
   NCE system. I got "good vibes" from them. Some users of
   competitive systems just couldn't relate to my specific situation
   and/or questions. You can get an idea of the personalities by
   lurking on various DCC e-groups lists. Ask a loaded question or
   two and evaluate the responses for
   yourself.  
-  
- 8. Everyone else in my local area had
   already chosen NCE. I could get lots of help quickly if help was
   needed. But no help was needed and so it didn't really matter.
   Quick phone calls to NCE once in a while resolved all the
   questions.
-  
- 9. Appreciation for NCE's philosophy that
   being first to market is less important than having a product that
   works. Simply works! Not some of the time, but works all of the
   time. Other firms rush things to market and then spend the next
   two years debugging it. I don't need that at all. I can wait a
   while until the design is solid and armor plated. No rush. Lots of
   other things to do in this hobby. Ballasting 600 feet of mainline
   track takes time. Groan.....
-  
- The above list is not in any order of
   importance. I am not generally impressed with all the technical
   whiz-bang features touted by some firms. I just want to run trains
   with an absolute minimum of hassle. My hobby is not electronics
   tinkering.
-  
- Hope this helps.
-  
- Sincerely,
-  
- Ed Loizeaux
This
page modified 8/12/02 -a -
-
   (bottom include
   
   
   
 (bottom1.html) 
James
R. Ingram
